We at [Web: Handyman] are firm believers that the world needs to replace fossil fuels with something that does not cause so many global problems.  We believe that man is smart enough to come up with an alternative to causing explosions and trying to harness the resulting energy.  In general, we don’t believe in causing explosions as a source of power,  or as a political statement.

We at [Web: Handyman] are firm believers that electricity is the logical choice to replace combustion as a source of power for our transportation needs.  There are so many ways to turn the earths intrinsic power into electricity.   With all that we have harnessed electrons to do already, electricity gets our vote.

[Web: Handyman] believes that once the world finds a better means to store electricity, and transport it from where it can be easily generated, to where it is needed for use,  the World will enjoy a much more peaceful existence.  Until then, we believe hybrid technology must certainly be a step in the right direction.

We  saw another feature recently that attempted to calculate the breakeven point for owning a hybrid vehicle.  The conclusion, as usual, was that it will take a very long time to recoup the difference in cost of ownership for a hybrid model vs. the gas powered equivalent.  I always wonder what the conclusion would be if they could take into consideration the taxes we pay, to maintain fighting forces all over the world, to protect our access to fossil fuel.   They always seem to conclude with a statement like “unless you are buying a hybrid to save the planet, you are better off buying  the gas powered model.”

I say fine! Let’s not buy hybrids to save gas money. Let’s buy hybrids and electric vehicles to save the world!

Monocasco-Electric-Bike

Please subscribe to this blog.  We will try to make it worth your while!